Comparative effectiveness research: what to do when experts disagree about risks

Reidar K. Lie, Francis K.L. Chan, Christine Grady, Vincent H. Ng, David Wendler

Open source

DOI: 10.1186/s12910-017-0202-0
Published: 2017-06-19
Container: BMC Medical Ethics
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1186/s12910-017-0202-0,
  title = {Comparative effectiveness research: what to do when experts disagree about risks},
  author = {Reidar K. Lie and Francis K.L. Chan and Christine Grady and Vincent H. Ng and David Wendler},
  year = {2017},
  journal = {BMC Medical Ethics},
  doi = {10.1186/s12910-017-0202-0},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0202-0}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative effectiveness research: what to do when experts disagree about risks
AU  - Reidar K. Lie
AU  - Francis K.L. Chan
AU  - Christine Grady
AU  - Vincent H. Ng
AU  - David Wendler
PY  - 2017
JO  - BMC Medical Ethics
DO  - 10.1186/s12910-017-0202-0
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0202-0
ER  -

APA

Lie, R. K., Chan, F. K., Grady, C., Ng, V. H., & Wendler, D. (2017). Comparative effectiveness research: what to do when experts disagree about risks. BMC Medical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0202-0

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:07:15.232Z