How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12910-020-00480-8
- Published
- 2020-05-12
- Container
- BMC Med Ethics
- Publisher
- figshare
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 61/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12910-020-00480-8,
title = {How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study.},
author = {Timmers M and van Dijck JTJM and van Wijk RPJ and Legrand V and van Veen E and Maas AIR and Menon DK and Citerio G and Stocchetti N and Kompanje EJO and CENTER-TBI investigators and participants.},
year = {2020},
journal = {BMC Med Ethics},
doi = {10.1186/s12910-020-00480-8},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00480-8}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study. AU - Timmers M AU - van Dijck JTJM AU - van Wijk RPJ AU - Legrand V AU - van Veen E AU - Maas AIR AU - Menon DK AU - Citerio G AU - Stocchetti N AU - Kompanje EJO AU - CENTER-TBI investigators and participants. PY - 2020 JO - BMC Med Ethics DO - 10.1186/s12910-020-00480-8 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00480-8 ER -
APA
M, T., JTJM, V. D., RPJ, V. W., V, L., E, V. V., AIR, M., DK, M., G, C., N, S., EJO, K., & participants., C. I. A. (2020). How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study.. BMC Med Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00480-8
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:30:28.405Z
- datacite · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:30:28.381Z
- datacite · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:30:28.381Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:30:28.380Z
- hal · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:30:28.442Z