Implementing broad consent for research with routinely collected clinical data and residual biosamples in a cancer hospital: using mixed methods approach to evaluate consent rates and patients' perspectives.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12910-025-01367-2
- Published
- 2026 Jan 9
- Container
- BMC medical ethics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12910-025-01367-2,
title = {Implementing broad consent for research with routinely collected clinical data and residual biosamples in a cancer hospital: using mixed methods approach to evaluate consent rates and patients' perspectives.},
author = {Beusink M and Rebers S and Broeks A and Kist I and van Luenen H and van Oord A and van Scheijen S and Schmidt MK},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMC medical ethics},
doi = {10.1186/s12910-025-01367-2},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01367-2}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Implementing broad consent for research with routinely collected clinical data and residual biosamples in a cancer hospital: using mixed methods approach to evaluate consent rates and patients' perspectives. AU - Beusink M AU - Rebers S AU - Broeks A AU - Kist I AU - van Luenen H AU - van Oord A AU - van Scheijen S AU - Schmidt MK PY - 2026 JO - BMC medical ethics DO - 10.1186/s12910-025-01367-2 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01367-2 ER -
APA
M, B., S, R., A, B., I, K., H, V. L., A, V. O., S, V. S., & MK, S. (2026). Implementing broad consent for research with routinely collected clinical data and residual biosamples in a cancer hospital: using mixed methods approach to evaluate consent rates and patients' perspectives.. BMC medical ethics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01367-2
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:01:19.105Z