How parents derive their informed role preferences for end-of-life medical decision-making for (unborn) children in perinatology: a meta-ethnography of qualitative interview studies.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12910-026-01605-1
- Published
- 2026-09-18
- Container
- BMC Med Ethics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12910-026-01605-1,
title = {How parents derive their informed role preferences for end-of-life medical decision-making for (unborn) children in perinatology: a meta-ethnography of qualitative interview studies.},
author = {Kuehlmeyer K and Beyer MF and Mang P and Flemmer AW and Schouten ES.},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMC Med Ethics},
doi = {10.1186/s12910-026-01605-1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01605-1}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - How parents derive their informed role preferences for end-of-life medical decision-making for (unborn) children in perinatology: a meta-ethnography of qualitative interview studies. AU - Kuehlmeyer K AU - Beyer MF AU - Mang P AU - Flemmer AW AU - Schouten ES. PY - 2026 JO - BMC Med Ethics DO - 10.1186/s12910-026-01605-1 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01605-1 ER -
APA
K, K., MF, B., P, M., AW, F., & ES., S. (2026). How parents derive their informed role preferences for end-of-life medical decision-making for (unborn) children in perinatology: a meta-ethnography of qualitative interview studies.. BMC Med Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-026-01605-1
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:40:19.335Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:40:19.342Z