Study protocol of an equivalence randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of three different approaches to collecting Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) data using the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria (PCOR-VIC)
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12913-017-1981-1
- Published
- 2017-01-23
- Container
- BMC Health Services Research
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12913-017-1981-1,
title = {Study protocol of an equivalence randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of three different approaches to collecting Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) data using the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria (PCOR-VIC)},
author = {Dewan Md Emdadul Hoque and Fanny Sampurno and Rasa Ruseckaite and Paula Lorgelly and Sue M. Evans},
year = {2017},
journal = {BMC Health Services Research},
doi = {10.1186/s12913-017-1981-1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-1981-1}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Study protocol of an equivalence randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of three different approaches to collecting Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) data using the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria (PCOR-VIC) AU - Dewan Md Emdadul Hoque AU - Fanny Sampurno AU - Rasa Ruseckaite AU - Paula Lorgelly AU - Sue M. Evans PY - 2017 JO - BMC Health Services Research DO - 10.1186/s12913-017-1981-1 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-1981-1 ER -
APA
Hoque, D. M. E., Sampurno, F., Ruseckaite, R., Lorgelly, P., & Evans, S. M. (2017). Study protocol of an equivalence randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of three different approaches to collecting Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) data using the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria (PCOR-VIC). BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-1981-1
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T12:24:45.383Z