Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12916-016-0631-5
- Published
- 2016 Jun 10
- Container
- BMC medicine
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12916-016-0631-5,
title = {Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.},
author = {Bruce R and Chauvin A and Trinquart L and Ravaud P and Boutron I},
year = {2016},
journal = {BMC medicine},
doi = {10.1186/s12916-016-0631-5},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0631-5}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AU - Bruce R AU - Chauvin A AU - Trinquart L AU - Ravaud P AU - Boutron I PY - 2016 JO - BMC medicine DO - 10.1186/s12916-016-0631-5 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0631-5 ER -
APA
R, B., A, C., L, T., P, R., & I, B. (2016). Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. BMC medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0631-5
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T14:58:10.323Z