Comparative analysis of laboratory-based and portable qPCR platforms: CFX, MIC, and Biomeme Franklin for African swine fever and avian influenza detection
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12917-026-05606-5
- Published
- 2026-06-19
- Container
- BMC Veterinary Research
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12917-026-05606-5,
title = {Comparative analysis of laboratory-based and portable qPCR platforms: CFX, MIC, and Biomeme Franklin for African swine fever and avian influenza detection},
author = {Agathe Auer and Tirumala B. K. Settypalli and Andriy Rozstalnyy and Artem Metlin and Adi Steinrigl and Pawin Padungtod and William G. Dundon and Charles E. Lamien},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMC Veterinary Research},
doi = {10.1186/s12917-026-05606-5},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-026-05606-5}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative analysis of laboratory-based and portable qPCR platforms: CFX, MIC, and Biomeme Franklin for African swine fever and avian influenza detection AU - Agathe Auer AU - Tirumala B. K. Settypalli AU - Andriy Rozstalnyy AU - Artem Metlin AU - Adi Steinrigl AU - Pawin Padungtod AU - William G. Dundon AU - Charles E. Lamien PY - 2026 JO - BMC Veterinary Research DO - 10.1186/s12917-026-05606-5 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-026-05606-5 ER -
APA
Auer, A., Settypalli, T. B. K., Rozstalnyy, A., Metlin, A., Steinrigl, A., Padungtod, P., Dundon, W. G., & Lamien, C. E. (2026). Comparative analysis of laboratory-based and portable qPCR platforms: CFX, MIC, and Biomeme Franklin for African swine fever and avian influenza detection. BMC Veterinary Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-026-05606-5
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T20:47:41.240Z