A randomised equivalence study of the EQ-5D-5L Shona versions: evaluation of measurement equivalence between digital and paper formats.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12955-026-02575-z
- Published
- 2026 Jun 29
- Container
- Health and quality of life outcomes
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12955-026-02575-z,
title = {A randomised equivalence study of the EQ-5D-5L Shona versions: evaluation of measurement equivalence between digital and paper formats.},
author = {Dambi JM and Purba FD and Shava BK and Hove AR and Doyce SR and Tunduwani T and Domingue B and Chibanda D and Pickard AS},
year = {2026},
journal = {Health and quality of life outcomes},
doi = {10.1186/s12955-026-02575-z},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-026-02575-z}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A randomised equivalence study of the EQ-5D-5L Shona versions: evaluation of measurement equivalence between digital and paper formats. AU - Dambi JM AU - Purba FD AU - Shava BK AU - Hove AR AU - Doyce SR AU - Tunduwani T AU - Domingue B AU - Chibanda D AU - Pickard AS PY - 2026 JO - Health and quality of life outcomes DO - 10.1186/s12955-026-02575-z UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-026-02575-z ER -
APA
JM, D., FD, P., BK, S., AR, H., SR, D., T, T., B, D., D, C., & AS, P. (2026). A randomised equivalence study of the EQ-5D-5L Shona versions: evaluation of measurement equivalence between digital and paper formats.. Health and quality of life outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-026-02575-z
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T07:41:56.428Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T07:41:56.446Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-26T07:41:56.422Z