Evaluating the quality of research co-production: Research Quality Plus for Co-Production (RQ + 4 Co-Pro).
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12961-023-00990-y
- Published
- 2023 Jun 13
- Container
- Health research policy and systems
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12961-023-00990-y,
title = {Evaluating the quality of research co-production: Research Quality Plus for Co-Production (RQ + 4 Co-Pro).},
author = {McLean RKD and Carden F and Aiken AB and Armstrong R and Bray J and Cassidy CE and Daub O and Di Ruggiero E and Fierro LA and Gagnon M and Hutchinson AM and Kislov R and Kothari A and Kreindler S and McCutcheon C and Reszel J and Scarrow G and Graham ID},
year = {2023},
journal = {Health research policy and systems},
doi = {10.1186/s12961-023-00990-y},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-00990-y}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Evaluating the quality of research co-production: Research Quality Plus for Co-Production (RQ + 4 Co-Pro). AU - McLean RKD AU - Carden F AU - Aiken AB AU - Armstrong R AU - Bray J AU - Cassidy CE AU - Daub O AU - Di Ruggiero E AU - Fierro LA AU - Gagnon M AU - Hutchinson AM AU - Kislov R AU - Kothari A AU - Kreindler S AU - McCutcheon C AU - Reszel J AU - Scarrow G AU - Graham ID PY - 2023 JO - Health research policy and systems DO - 10.1186/s12961-023-00990-y UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-00990-y ER -
APA
RKD, M., F, C., AB, A., R, A., J, B., CE, C., O, D., E, D. R., LA, F., M, G., AM, H., R, K., A, K., S, K., C, M., J, R., G, S., & ID, G. (2023). Evaluating the quality of research co-production: Research Quality Plus for Co-Production (RQ + 4 Co-Pro).. Health research policy and systems. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-00990-y
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T08:56:53.562Z