An economic evaluation of the MultICath randomised controlled trial, comparing combined use of reusable and single-use intermittent catheters to single-use catheters only.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12962-026-00750-z
- Published
- 2026 May 9
- Container
- Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12962-026-00750-z,
title = {An economic evaluation of the MultICath randomised controlled trial, comparing combined use of reusable and single-use intermittent catheters to single-use catheters only.},
author = {McCloskey S and Sach TH and Macaulay M and Avery MR and Chadwick TJ and Clancy B and Dickson S and Goudie N and Guerrero K and Hagen S and Murphy C and Watson GC and Wilson N and Wood R and Fader M},
year = {2026},
journal = {Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E},
doi = {10.1186/s12962-026-00750-z},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-026-00750-z}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - An economic evaluation of the MultICath randomised controlled trial, comparing combined use of reusable and single-use intermittent catheters to single-use catheters only. AU - McCloskey S AU - Sach TH AU - Macaulay M AU - Avery MR AU - Chadwick TJ AU - Clancy B AU - Dickson S AU - Goudie N AU - Guerrero K AU - Hagen S AU - Murphy C AU - Watson GC AU - Wilson N AU - Wood R AU - Fader M PY - 2026 JO - Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E DO - 10.1186/s12962-026-00750-z UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-026-00750-z ER -
APA
S, M., TH, S., M, M., MR, A., TJ, C., B, C., S, D., N, G., K, G., S, H., C, M., GC, W., N, W., R, W., & M, F. (2026). An economic evaluation of the MultICath randomised controlled trial, comparing combined use of reusable and single-use intermittent catheters to single-use catheters only.. Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-026-00750-z
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T06:39:58.003Z