Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ALK-positive NSCLC sequential strategies under physician and patient preferences.

Li H, Zhao M, Yin Y, Li J, Tang W

DOI: 10.1186/s12962-026-00762-9
Published: 2026 May 12
Container: Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1186/s12962-026-00762-9,
  title = {Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ALK-positive NSCLC sequential strategies under physician and patient preferences.},
  author = {Li H and Zhao M and Yin Y and Li J and Tang W},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E},
  doi = {10.1186/s12962-026-00762-9},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-026-00762-9}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ALK-positive NSCLC sequential strategies under physician and patient preferences.
AU  - Li H
AU  - Zhao M
AU  - Yin Y
AU  - Li J
AU  - Tang W
PY  - 2026
JO  - Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E
DO  - 10.1186/s12962-026-00762-9
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-026-00762-9
ER  -

APA

H, L., M, Z., Y, Y., J, L., & W, T. (2026). Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ALK-positive NSCLC sequential strategies under physician and patient preferences.. Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-026-00762-9

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T07:54:38.378Z