That’s not how the learning works – the paradox of Reverse Innovation: a qualitative study
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12992-016-0175-7
- Published
- 2016-07-05
- Container
- Globalization and Health
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s12992-016-0175-7,
title = {That’s not how the learning works – the paradox of Reverse Innovation: a qualitative study},
author = {Matthew Harris and Emily Weisberger and Diana Silver and Viva Dadwal and James Macinko},
year = {2016},
journal = {Globalization and Health},
doi = {10.1186/s12992-016-0175-7},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0175-7}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - That’s not how the learning works – the paradox of Reverse Innovation: a qualitative study AU - Matthew Harris AU - Emily Weisberger AU - Diana Silver AU - Viva Dadwal AU - James Macinko PY - 2016 JO - Globalization and Health DO - 10.1186/s12992-016-0175-7 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0175-7 ER -
APA
Harris, M., Weisberger, E., Silver, D., Dadwal, V., & Macinko, J. (2016). That’s not how the learning works – the paradox of Reverse Innovation: a qualitative study. Globalization and Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0175-7
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T00:34:33.715Z