That’s not how the learning works – the paradox of Reverse Innovation: a qualitative study

Matthew Harris, Emily Weisberger, Diana Silver, Viva Dadwal, James Macinko

Open source

DOI
10.1186/s12992-016-0175-7
Published
2016-07-05
Container
Globalization and Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1186/s12992-016-0175-7,
  title = {That’s not how the learning works – the paradox of Reverse Innovation: a qualitative study},
  author = {Matthew Harris and Emily Weisberger and Diana Silver and Viva Dadwal and James Macinko},
  year = {2016},
  journal = {Globalization and Health},
  doi = {10.1186/s12992-016-0175-7},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0175-7}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - That’s not how the learning works – the paradox of Reverse Innovation: a qualitative study
AU  - Matthew Harris
AU  - Emily Weisberger
AU  - Diana Silver
AU  - Viva Dadwal
AU  - James Macinko
PY  - 2016
JO  - Globalization and Health
DO  - 10.1186/s12992-016-0175-7
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0175-7
ER  - 

APA

Harris, M., Weisberger, E., Silver, D., Dadwal, V., & Macinko, J. (2016). That’s not how the learning works – the paradox of Reverse Innovation: a qualitative study. Globalization and Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0175-7

Source records