Standardising evidence strength grading for recommendations from multiple clinical practice guidelines: a South African case study
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13012-018-0803-0
- Published
- 2018-08-29
- Container
- Implementation Science
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s13012-018-0803-0,
title = {Standardising evidence strength grading for recommendations from multiple clinical practice guidelines: a South African case study},
author = {K. Grimmer and Q. Louw and J. M. Dizon and S-M van Niekerk and D. Ernstzen and C. Wiysonge},
year = {2018},
journal = {Implementation Science},
doi = {10.1186/s13012-018-0803-0},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0803-0}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Standardising evidence strength grading for recommendations from multiple clinical practice guidelines: a South African case study AU - K. Grimmer AU - Q. Louw AU - J. M. Dizon AU - S-M van Niekerk AU - D. Ernstzen AU - C. Wiysonge PY - 2018 JO - Implementation Science DO - 10.1186/s13012-018-0803-0 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0803-0 ER -
APA
Grimmer, K., Louw, Q., Dizon, J. M., Niekerk, S. V., Ernstzen, D., & Wiysonge, C. (2018). Standardising evidence strength grading for recommendations from multiple clinical practice guidelines: a South African case study. Implementation Science. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0803-0
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T14:28:48.097Z