Comparison of radiation-induced temporal lobe injury after helical tomotherapy versus conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score-matched cohort study.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13014-026-02788-y
- Published
- 2026 Jan 8
- Container
- Radiation oncology (London, England)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s13014-026-02788-y,
title = {Comparison of radiation-induced temporal lobe injury after helical tomotherapy versus conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score-matched cohort study.},
author = {Liu Q and Yao WY and Xu PX and Fang YW and Lin ZY and Li ZT and Chi F and Xia WX and Xu SK},
year = {2026},
journal = {Radiation oncology (London, England)},
doi = {10.1186/s13014-026-02788-y},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-026-02788-y}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of radiation-induced temporal lobe injury after helical tomotherapy versus conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score-matched cohort study. AU - Liu Q AU - Yao WY AU - Xu PX AU - Fang YW AU - Lin ZY AU - Li ZT AU - Chi F AU - Xia WX AU - Xu SK PY - 2026 JO - Radiation oncology (London, England) DO - 10.1186/s13014-026-02788-y UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-026-02788-y ER -
APA
Q, L., WY, Y., PX, X., YW, F., ZY, L., ZT, L., F, C., WX, X., & SK, X. (2026). Comparison of radiation-induced temporal lobe injury after helical tomotherapy versus conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score-matched cohort study.. Radiation oncology (London, England). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-026-02788-y
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T19:49:18.797Z