Three-dimensional printed artificial vertebral body versus titanium mesh cage and nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 cage in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion: a retrospective cohort study with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

Dong C, Zhao Z, Zhou J, Cao S, Li W, Ye J, Wei H.

Open source

DOI
10.1186/s13018-026-07076-9
Published
2026-07-08
Container
J Orthop Surg Res
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1186/s13018-026-07076-9,
  title = {Three-dimensional printed artificial vertebral body versus titanium mesh cage and nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 cage in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion: a retrospective cohort study with a minimum 5-year follow-up.},
  author = {Dong C and  Zhao Z and  Zhou J and  Cao S and  Li W and  Ye J and  Wei H.},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {J Orthop Surg Res},
  doi = {10.1186/s13018-026-07076-9},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07076-9}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Three-dimensional printed artificial vertebral body versus titanium mesh cage and nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 cage in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion: a retrospective cohort study with a minimum 5-year follow-up.
AU  - Dong C
AU  -  Zhao Z
AU  -  Zhou J
AU  -  Cao S
AU  -  Li W
AU  -  Ye J
AU  -  Wei H.
PY  - 2026
JO  - J Orthop Surg Res
DO  - 10.1186/s13018-026-07076-9
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07076-9
ER  - 

APA

C, D., Z, Z., J, Z., S, C., W, L., J, Y., & H., W. (2026). Three-dimensional printed artificial vertebral body versus titanium mesh cage and nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 cage in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion: a retrospective cohort study with a minimum 5-year follow-up.. J Orthop Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07076-9

Source records