Clinical and functional outcomes of upper extremity 3D-printed immobilization devices compared to traditional methods: a systematic review with limited meta-analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13018-026-07109-3
- Published
- 2026-07-10
- Container
- J Orthop Surg Res
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s13018-026-07109-3,
title = {Clinical and functional outcomes of upper extremity 3D-printed immobilization devices compared to traditional methods: a systematic review with limited meta-analysis.},
author = {Watson A and Hauke S and DeRoma K and Shrestha R and Vimawala A and Lohse M and Falak A and Chao W and Smith A and Murphy T and Kittani R.},
year = {2026},
journal = {J Orthop Surg Res},
doi = {10.1186/s13018-026-07109-3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07109-3}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Clinical and functional outcomes of upper extremity 3D-printed immobilization devices compared to traditional methods: a systematic review with limited meta-analysis. AU - Watson A AU - Hauke S AU - DeRoma K AU - Shrestha R AU - Vimawala A AU - Lohse M AU - Falak A AU - Chao W AU - Smith A AU - Murphy T AU - Kittani R. PY - 2026 JO - J Orthop Surg Res DO - 10.1186/s13018-026-07109-3 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07109-3 ER -
APA
A, W., S, H., K, D., R, S., A, V., M, L., A, F., W, C., A, S., T, M., & R., K. (2026). Clinical and functional outcomes of upper extremity 3D-printed immobilization devices compared to traditional methods: a systematic review with limited meta-analysis.. J Orthop Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07109-3
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T17:35:00.192Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-25T17:35:00.153Z