Comparative effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy versus conventional usual care for non-acute low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13063-019-3302-y
- Published
- 2019-04-15
- Container
- Trials
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s13063-019-3302-y,
title = {Comparative effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy versus conventional usual care for non-acute low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial.},
author = {Lim KT and Hwang EH and Cho JH and Jung JY and Kim KW and Ha IH and Kim MR and Nam K and Lee A MH and Lee JH and Kim N and Shin BC.},
year = {2019},
journal = {Trials},
doi = {10.1186/s13063-019-3302-y},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3302-y}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy versus conventional usual care for non-acute low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial. AU - Lim KT AU - Hwang EH AU - Cho JH AU - Jung JY AU - Kim KW AU - Ha IH AU - Kim MR AU - Nam K AU - Lee A MH AU - Lee JH AU - Kim N AU - Shin BC. PY - 2019 JO - Trials DO - 10.1186/s13063-019-3302-y UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3302-y ER -
APA
KT, L., EH, H., JH, C., JY, J., KW, K., IH, H., MR, K., K, N., MH, L. A., JH, L., N, K., & BC., S. (2019). Comparative effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy versus conventional usual care for non-acute low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial.. Trials. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3302-y
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-27T04:05:44.463Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-27T04:05:44.472Z