Comparing the efficacy and safety of the ABC-14 regimen (azacitidine, venetoclax, and chidamide) with traditional "3 + 7" intensive induction regimen or AB-14 regimen (venetoclax combined with azacitidine) in newly diagnosed AML: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13063-025-09339-y
- Published
- 2025 Dec 10
- Container
- Trials
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s13063-025-09339-y,
title = {Comparing the efficacy and safety of the ABC-14 regimen (azacitidine, venetoclax, and chidamide) with traditional "3 + 7" intensive induction regimen or AB-14 regimen (venetoclax combined with azacitidine) in newly diagnosed AML: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial.},
author = {Yan H and Huang X and Wu P and Deng C and Li M and Lai P and Du X and Weng J},
year = {2025},
journal = {Trials},
doi = {10.1186/s13063-025-09339-y},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09339-y}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparing the efficacy and safety of the ABC-14 regimen (azacitidine, venetoclax, and chidamide) with traditional "3 + 7" intensive induction regimen or AB-14 regimen (venetoclax combined with azacitidine) in newly diagnosed AML: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial. AU - Yan H AU - Huang X AU - Wu P AU - Deng C AU - Li M AU - Lai P AU - Du X AU - Weng J PY - 2025 JO - Trials DO - 10.1186/s13063-025-09339-y UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09339-y ER -
APA
H, Y., X, H., P, W., C, D., M, L., P, L., X, D., & J, W. (2025). Comparing the efficacy and safety of the ABC-14 regimen (azacitidine, venetoclax, and chidamide) with traditional "3 + 7" intensive induction regimen or AB-14 regimen (venetoclax combined with azacitidine) in newly diagnosed AML: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial.. Trials. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09339-y
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T11:26:11.570Z