Assessing the reliability of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST): a systematic review of the factors contributing to inter-observer variability.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13244-026-02320-6
- Published
- 2026 Jun 30
- Container
- Insights into imaging
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s13244-026-02320-6,
title = {Assessing the reliability of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST): a systematic review of the factors contributing to inter-observer variability.},
author = {Smesseim I and Bucho TT and Tissier R and van der Mierden S and Lalezari F and Burgers JA and Trebeschi S},
year = {2026},
journal = {Insights into imaging},
doi = {10.1186/s13244-026-02320-6},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-026-02320-6}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Assessing the reliability of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST): a systematic review of the factors contributing to inter-observer variability. AU - Smesseim I AU - Bucho TT AU - Tissier R AU - van der Mierden S AU - Lalezari F AU - Burgers JA AU - Trebeschi S PY - 2026 JO - Insights into imaging DO - 10.1186/s13244-026-02320-6 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-026-02320-6 ER -
APA
I, S., TT, B., R, T., S, V. D. M., F, L., JA, B., & S, T. (2026). Assessing the reliability of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST): a systematic review of the factors contributing to inter-observer variability.. Insights into imaging. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-026-02320-6
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T16:50:13.601Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-11-10T16:50:13.595Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-11-10T16:50:13.578Z