Methodological quality and reporting standards in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of physical activity studies: a report from the Strengthening the Evidence in Exercise Sciences Initiative (SEES Initiative)
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13643-021-01845-9
- Published
- 2021-12
- Container
- Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s13643-021-01845-9,
title = {Methodological quality and reporting standards in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of physical activity studies: a report from the Strengthening the Evidence in Exercise Sciences Initiative (SEES Initiative)},
author = {Nórton Luís Oliveira and Cíntia Ehlers Botton and Angélica Trevisan De Nardi and Daniel Umpierre},
year = {2021},
journal = {Systematic Reviews},
doi = {10.1186/s13643-021-01845-9},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01845-9}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Methodological quality and reporting standards in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of physical activity studies: a report from the Strengthening the Evidence in Exercise Sciences Initiative (SEES Initiative) AU - Nórton Luís Oliveira AU - Cíntia Ehlers Botton AU - Angélica Trevisan De Nardi AU - Daniel Umpierre PY - 2021 JO - Systematic Reviews DO - 10.1186/s13643-021-01845-9 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01845-9 ER -
APA
Oliveira, N. L., Botton, C. E., Nardi, A. T. D., & Umpierre, D. (2021). Methodological quality and reporting standards in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of physical activity studies: a report from the Strengthening the Evidence in Exercise Sciences Initiative (SEES Initiative). Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01845-9
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T06:08:06.343Z