Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool).
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13643-023-02388-x
- Published
- 2024 Jan 12
- Container
- Systematic reviews
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s13643-023-02388-x,
title = {Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool).},
author = {Lunny C and Veroniki AA and Higgins JPT and Dias S and Hutton B and Wright JM and White IR and Whiting P and Tricco AC},
year = {2024},
journal = {Systematic reviews},
doi = {10.1186/s13643-023-02388-x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02388-x}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool). AU - Lunny C AU - Veroniki AA AU - Higgins JPT AU - Dias S AU - Hutton B AU - Wright JM AU - White IR AU - Whiting P AU - Tricco AC PY - 2024 JO - Systematic reviews DO - 10.1186/s13643-023-02388-x UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02388-x ER -
APA
C, L., AA, V., JPT, H., S, D., B, H., JM, W., IR, W., P, W., & AC, T. (2024). Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool).. Systematic reviews. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02388-x
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T07:24:42.766Z