Protocol of a collaborative evaluation systematized non-systematic reviews by "DESCreview", a Design tool for Evaluating risk of bias/quality in Systematized and sCoping reviews.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13690-025-01622-3
- Published
- 2025 Jun 5
- Container
- Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s13690-025-01622-3,
title = {Protocol of a collaborative evaluation systematized non-systematic reviews by "DESCreview", a Design tool for Evaluating risk of bias/quality in Systematized and sCoping reviews.},
author = {Descatha A and Mayet A and Sembajwe G and Fadel M},
year = {2025},
journal = {Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique},
doi = {10.1186/s13690-025-01622-3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01622-3}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Protocol of a collaborative evaluation systematized non-systematic reviews by "DESCreview", a Design tool for Evaluating risk of bias/quality in Systematized and sCoping reviews. AU - Descatha A AU - Mayet A AU - Sembajwe G AU - Fadel M PY - 2025 JO - Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique DO - 10.1186/s13690-025-01622-3 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01622-3 ER -
APA
A, D., A, M., G, S., & M, F. (2025). Protocol of a collaborative evaluation systematized non-systematic reviews by "DESCreview", a Design tool for Evaluating risk of bias/quality in Systematized and sCoping reviews.. Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01622-3
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T07:32:21.762Z