Replicability or revision? Further evidence on the psychometric quality of the German version of the epistemic trust, mistrust and credulity questionnaire.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s40359-026-04810-0
- Published
- 2026 May 26
- Container
- BMC psychology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s40359-026-04810-0,
title = {Replicability or revision? Further evidence on the psychometric quality of the German version of the epistemic trust, mistrust and credulity questionnaire.},
author = {Schwarzer NH and Behringer N and Dees P and Gingelmaier S and Henter M and Kirsch H and Kreuzer T and Langnickel R and Link PC and Müller S and Turner A and Nolte T},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMC psychology},
doi = {10.1186/s40359-026-04810-0},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04810-0}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Replicability or revision? Further evidence on the psychometric quality of the German version of the epistemic trust, mistrust and credulity questionnaire. AU - Schwarzer NH AU - Behringer N AU - Dees P AU - Gingelmaier S AU - Henter M AU - Kirsch H AU - Kreuzer T AU - Langnickel R AU - Link PC AU - Müller S AU - Turner A AU - Nolte T PY - 2026 JO - BMC psychology DO - 10.1186/s40359-026-04810-0 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04810-0 ER -
APA
NH, S., N, B., P, D., S, G., M, H., H, K., T, K., R, L., PC, L., S, M., A, T., & T, N. (2026). Replicability or revision? Further evidence on the psychometric quality of the German version of the epistemic trust, mistrust and credulity questionnaire.. BMC psychology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04810-0
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T00:13:31.876Z