Comparing human and AI emotional evaluations of images: GPT-4o performance across standard, persona, and language-specific prompting strategies.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s40359-026-05067-3
- Published
- 2026 Jun 26
- Container
- BMC psychology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s40359-026-05067-3,
title = {Comparing human and AI emotional evaluations of images: GPT-4o performance across standard, persona, and language-specific prompting strategies.},
author = {Kobayashi M and Goto A and Himuro A},
year = {2026},
journal = {BMC psychology},
doi = {10.1186/s40359-026-05067-3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05067-3}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparing human and AI emotional evaluations of images: GPT-4o performance across standard, persona, and language-specific prompting strategies. AU - Kobayashi M AU - Goto A AU - Himuro A PY - 2026 JO - BMC psychology DO - 10.1186/s40359-026-05067-3 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05067-3 ER -
APA
M, K., A, G., & A, H. (2026). Comparing human and AI emotional evaluations of images: GPT-4o performance across standard, persona, and language-specific prompting strategies.. BMC psychology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05067-3