STEM courses are harder: evaluating inter-course grading disparities with a calibrated GPA model

Jonathan H. Tomkin, Matthew West

Open source

DOI
10.1186/s40594-022-00343-1
Published
2022-03-17
Container
International Journal of STEM Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1186/s40594-022-00343-1,
  title = {STEM courses are harder: evaluating inter-course grading disparities with a calibrated GPA model},
  author = {Jonathan H. Tomkin and Matthew West},
  year = {2022},
  journal = {International Journal of STEM Education},
  doi = {10.1186/s40594-022-00343-1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00343-1}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - STEM courses are harder: evaluating inter-course grading disparities with a calibrated GPA model
AU  - Jonathan H. Tomkin
AU  - Matthew West
PY  - 2022
JO  - International Journal of STEM Education
DO  - 10.1186/s40594-022-00343-1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00343-1
ER  - 

APA

Tomkin, J. H., & West, M. (2022). STEM courses are harder: evaluating inter-course grading disparities with a calibrated GPA model. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00343-1

Source records