Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s40662-021-00249-z
- Published
- 2021 Jul 1
- Container
- Eye and vision (London, England)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s40662-021-00249-z,
title = {Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.},
author = {Nakakura S and Asaoka R and Terao E and Nagata Y and Fukuma Y and Oogi S and Shiraishi M and Kiuchi Y},
year = {2021},
journal = {Eye and vision (London, England)},
doi = {10.1186/s40662-021-00249-z},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-021-00249-z}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma. AU - Nakakura S AU - Asaoka R AU - Terao E AU - Nagata Y AU - Fukuma Y AU - Oogi S AU - Shiraishi M AU - Kiuchi Y PY - 2021 JO - Eye and vision (London, England) DO - 10.1186/s40662-021-00249-z UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-021-00249-z ER -
APA
S, N., R, A., E, T., Y, N., Y, F., S, O., M, S., & Y, K. (2021). Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.. Eye and vision (London, England). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-021-00249-z
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:07:12.898Z