Assessing the Extent to Which Current Clinical Research is Consistent with Patient Priorities: A Scoping Review Using a Case Study in Patients on or Nearing Dialysis
- DOI
- 10.1186/s40697-015-0070-9
- Published
- 2015-01-01
- Container
- Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s40697-015-0070-9,
title = {Assessing the Extent to Which Current Clinical Research is Consistent with Patient Priorities: A Scoping Review Using a Case Study in Patients on or Nearing Dialysis},
author = {Min Jun and Braden Manns and Andreas Laupacis and Liam Manns and Bhavdeep Rehal and Sally Crowe and Brenda R. Hemmelgarn},
year = {2015},
journal = {Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease},
doi = {10.1186/s40697-015-0070-9},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40697-015-0070-9}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Assessing the Extent to Which Current Clinical Research is Consistent with Patient Priorities: A Scoping Review Using a Case Study in Patients on or Nearing Dialysis AU - Min Jun AU - Braden Manns AU - Andreas Laupacis AU - Liam Manns AU - Bhavdeep Rehal AU - Sally Crowe AU - Brenda R. Hemmelgarn PY - 2015 JO - Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease DO - 10.1186/s40697-015-0070-9 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40697-015-0070-9 ER -
APA
Jun, M., Manns, B., Laupacis, A., Manns, L., Rehal, B., Crowe, S., & Hemmelgarn, B. R. (2015). Assessing the Extent to Which Current Clinical Research is Consistent with Patient Priorities: A Scoping Review Using a Case Study in Patients on or Nearing Dialysis. Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40697-015-0070-9
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T10:32:44.627Z