Beyond reliability: assessing rater competence when using a behavioural marker system.
- DOI
- 10.1186/s41077-024-00329-9
- Published
- 2024 Dec 31
- Container
- Advances in simulation (London, England)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s41077-024-00329-9,
title = {Beyond reliability: assessing rater competence when using a behavioural marker system.},
author = {Smith SE and McColgan-Smith S and Stewart F and Mardon J and Tallentire VR},
year = {2024},
journal = {Advances in simulation (London, England)},
doi = {10.1186/s41077-024-00329-9},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-024-00329-9}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Beyond reliability: assessing rater competence when using a behavioural marker system. AU - Smith SE AU - McColgan-Smith S AU - Stewart F AU - Mardon J AU - Tallentire VR PY - 2024 JO - Advances in simulation (London, England) DO - 10.1186/s41077-024-00329-9 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-024-00329-9 ER -
APA
SE, S., S, M., F, S., J, M., & VR, T. (2024). Beyond reliability: assessing rater competence when using a behavioural marker system.. Advances in simulation (London, England). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-024-00329-9
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T12:05:45.066Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-11-10T12:05:45.072Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-11-10T12:05:45.072Z