Comparative analysis of conventionally and additively manufactured acetabular shells from a single manufacturer.

Hothi H, Henckel J, Nicum A, Di Laura A, Schlueter-Brust K, Hart A

Open source

DOI
10.1186/s41205-024-00233-y
Published
2024 Sep 29
Container
3D printing in medicine
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1186/s41205-024-00233-y,
  title = {Comparative analysis of conventionally and additively manufactured acetabular shells from a single manufacturer.},
  author = {Hothi H and Henckel J and Nicum A and Di Laura A and Schlueter-Brust K and Hart A},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {3D printing in medicine},
  doi = {10.1186/s41205-024-00233-y},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-024-00233-y}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative analysis of conventionally and additively manufactured acetabular shells from a single manufacturer.
AU  - Hothi H
AU  - Henckel J
AU  - Nicum A
AU  - Di Laura A
AU  - Schlueter-Brust K
AU  - Hart A
PY  - 2024
JO  - 3D printing in medicine
DO  - 10.1186/s41205-024-00233-y
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-024-00233-y
ER  - 

APA

H, H., J, H., A, N., A, D. L., K, S., & A, H. (2024). Comparative analysis of conventionally and additively manufactured acetabular shells from a single manufacturer.. 3D printing in medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-024-00233-y

Source records