Use of qualitative and mixed methods research in diagnostic technology evaluation and implementation: insights from a systematic review
- DOI
- 10.1186/s41512-026-00240-z
- Published
- 2026-10-07
- Container
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1186/s41512-026-00240-z,
title = {Use of qualitative and mixed methods research in diagnostic technology evaluation and implementation: insights from a systematic review},
author = {Caity Roleston and Umasha Ukwatte and Nia Roberts and Gail N. Hayward and Philip J. Turner and Margaret Glogowska},
year = {2026},
journal = {Diagnostic and Prognostic Research},
doi = {10.1186/s41512-026-00240-z},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-026-00240-z}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Use of qualitative and mixed methods research in diagnostic technology evaluation and implementation: insights from a systematic review AU - Caity Roleston AU - Umasha Ukwatte AU - Nia Roberts AU - Gail N. Hayward AU - Philip J. Turner AU - Margaret Glogowska PY - 2026 JO - Diagnostic and Prognostic Research DO - 10.1186/s41512-026-00240-z UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-026-00240-z ER -
APA
Roleston, C., Ukwatte, U., Roberts, N., Hayward, G. N., Turner, P. J., & Glogowska, M. (2026). Use of qualitative and mixed methods research in diagnostic technology evaluation and implementation: insights from a systematic review. Diagnostic and Prognostic Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-026-00240-z
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-07T09:29:22.098Z