Anatomic versus reverse total shoulder replacement with an intact rotator cuff: a comparative musculoskeletal simulation study of glenohumeral joint biomechanics.

Soodmand I, Tischer T, Herrmann S, Klose T, Ruehrmund L, Lutter C, Woernle C, Bader R, Kebbach M

Open source

DOI
10.1186/s42836-026-00432-4
Published
2026 Oct 1
Container
Arthroplasty (London, England)
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1186/s42836-026-00432-4,
  title = {Anatomic versus reverse total shoulder replacement with an intact rotator cuff: a comparative musculoskeletal simulation study of glenohumeral joint biomechanics.},
  author = {Soodmand I and Tischer T and Herrmann S and Klose T and Ruehrmund L and Lutter C and Woernle C and Bader R and Kebbach M},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Arthroplasty (London, England)},
  doi = {10.1186/s42836-026-00432-4},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-026-00432-4}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Anatomic versus reverse total shoulder replacement with an intact rotator cuff: a comparative musculoskeletal simulation study of glenohumeral joint biomechanics.
AU  - Soodmand I
AU  - Tischer T
AU  - Herrmann S
AU  - Klose T
AU  - Ruehrmund L
AU  - Lutter C
AU  - Woernle C
AU  - Bader R
AU  - Kebbach M
PY  - 2026
JO  - Arthroplasty (London, England)
DO  - 10.1186/s42836-026-00432-4
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-026-00432-4
ER  - 

APA

I, S., T, T., S, H., T, K., L, R., C, L., C, W., R, B., & M, K. (2026). Anatomic versus reverse total shoulder replacement with an intact rotator cuff: a comparative musculoskeletal simulation study of glenohumeral joint biomechanics.. Arthroplasty (London, England). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-026-00432-4

Source records