Evaluating research co-production: protocol for the Research Quality Plus for Co-Production (RQ+ 4 Co-Pro) framework

Robert K. D. McLean, Fred Carden, Ian D. Graham, Alice B. Aiken, Rebecca Armstrong, Judy Bray, Christine E. Cassidy, Olivia Daub, Erica Di Ruggiero, Leslie A. Fierro, Michelle Gagnon, Alison M. Hutchinson, Roman Kislov, Anita Kothari, Sara Kreindler, Chris McCutcheon, Jessica Reszel, Gayle Scarrow

Open source

DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00265-7
Published: 2022-03-14
Container: Implementation Science Communications
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1186/s43058-022-00265-7,
  title = {Evaluating research co-production: protocol for the Research Quality Plus for Co-Production (RQ+ 4 Co-Pro) framework},
  author = {Robert K. D. McLean and Fred Carden and Ian D. Graham and Alice B. Aiken and Rebecca Armstrong and Judy Bray and Christine E. Cassidy and Olivia Daub and Erica Di Ruggiero and Leslie A. Fierro and Michelle Gagnon and Alison M. Hutchinson and Roman Kislov and Anita Kothari and Sara Kreindler and Chris McCutcheon and Jessica Reszel and Gayle Scarrow},
  year = {2022},
  journal = {Implementation Science Communications},
  doi = {10.1186/s43058-022-00265-7},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00265-7}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluating research co-production: protocol for the Research Quality Plus for Co-Production (RQ+ 4 Co-Pro) framework
AU  - Robert K. D. McLean
AU  - Fred Carden
AU  - Ian D. Graham
AU  - Alice B. Aiken
AU  - Rebecca Armstrong
AU  - Judy Bray
AU  - Christine E. Cassidy
AU  - Olivia Daub
AU  - Erica Di Ruggiero
AU  - Leslie A. Fierro
AU  - Michelle Gagnon
AU  - Alison M. Hutchinson
AU  - Roman Kislov
AU  - Anita Kothari
AU  - Sara Kreindler
AU  - Chris McCutcheon
AU  - Jessica Reszel
AU  - Gayle Scarrow
PY  - 2022
JO  - Implementation Science Communications
DO  - 10.1186/s43058-022-00265-7
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00265-7
ER  -

APA

McLean, R. K. D., Carden, F., Graham, I. D., Aiken, A. B., Armstrong, R., Bray, J., Cassidy, C. E., Daub, O., Ruggiero, E. D., Fierro, L. A., Gagnon, M., Hutchinson, A. M., Kislov, R., Kothari, A., Kreindler, S., McCutcheon, C., Reszel, J., & Scarrow, G. (2022). Evaluating research co-production: protocol for the Research Quality Plus for Co-Production (RQ+ 4 Co-Pro) framework. Implementation Science Communications. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00265-7

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-11-07T03:16:16.568Z