High-flow nasal therapy vs conventional oxygen therapy in mild COVID-19 hypoxaemia: a Bayesian reanalysis of the COVID-HIGH Trial.

Crimi C, Sardo S, Noto A, Madotto F, Ippolito M, Nolasco S, Campisi R, Fiorentino G, Pantazopoulos I, Chalkias A, Mattei A, Scala R, Clini E, Ergan B, Lujan M, Winck JC, Giarratano A, Carlucci A, Gregoretti C, Groff P, Cortegiani A, COVID-HIGH Investigators

Open source

DOI: 10.1186/s44158-026-00361-3
Published: 2026 Feb 21
Container: Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1186/s44158-026-00361-3,
  title = {High-flow nasal therapy vs conventional oxygen therapy in mild COVID-19 hypoxaemia: a Bayesian reanalysis of the COVID-HIGH Trial.},
  author = {Crimi C and Sardo S and Noto A and Madotto F and Ippolito M and Nolasco S and Campisi R and Fiorentino G and Pantazopoulos I and Chalkias A and Mattei A and Scala R and Clini E and Ergan B and Lujan M and Winck JC and Giarratano A and Carlucci A and Gregoretti C and Groff P and Cortegiani A and COVID-HIGH Investigators},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care},
  doi = {10.1186/s44158-026-00361-3},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-026-00361-3}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - High-flow nasal therapy vs conventional oxygen therapy in mild COVID-19 hypoxaemia: a Bayesian reanalysis of the COVID-HIGH Trial.
AU  - Crimi C
AU  - Sardo S
AU  - Noto A
AU  - Madotto F
AU  - Ippolito M
AU  - Nolasco S
AU  - Campisi R
AU  - Fiorentino G
AU  - Pantazopoulos I
AU  - Chalkias A
AU  - Mattei A
AU  - Scala R
AU  - Clini E
AU  - Ergan B
AU  - Lujan M
AU  - Winck JC
AU  - Giarratano A
AU  - Carlucci A
AU  - Gregoretti C
AU  - Groff P
AU  - Cortegiani A
AU  - COVID-HIGH Investigators
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care
DO  - 10.1186/s44158-026-00361-3
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-026-00361-3
ER  -

APA

C, C., S, S., A, N., F, M., M, I., S, N., R, C., G, F., I, P., A, C., A, M., R, S., E, C., B, E., M, L., JC, W., A, G., A, C., C, G., P, G., A, C., & Investigators, C. (2026). High-flow nasal therapy vs conventional oxygen therapy in mild COVID-19 hypoxaemia: a Bayesian reanalysis of the COVID-HIGH Trial.. Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-026-00361-3

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:59:24.851Z