Checking Equity: Why Differential Item Functioning Analysis Should Be a Routine Part of Developing Conceptual Assessments.
- DOI
- 10.1187/cbe.16-10-0307
- Published
- 2017 Summer
- Container
- CBE life sciences education
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1187/cbe.16-10-0307,
title = {Checking Equity: Why Differential Item Functioning Analysis Should Be a Routine Part of Developing Conceptual Assessments.},
author = {Martinková P and Drabinová A and Liaw YL and Sanders EA and McFarland JL and Price RM},
year = {2017},
journal = {CBE life sciences education},
doi = {10.1187/cbe.16-10-0307},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-10-0307}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Checking Equity: Why Differential Item Functioning Analysis Should Be a Routine Part of Developing Conceptual Assessments. AU - Martinková P AU - Drabinová A AU - Liaw YL AU - Sanders EA AU - McFarland JL AU - Price RM PY - 2017 JO - CBE life sciences education DO - 10.1187/cbe.16-10-0307 UR - https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-10-0307 ER -
APA
P, M., A, D., YL, L., EA, S., JL, M., & RM, P. (2017). Checking Equity: Why Differential Item Functioning Analysis Should Be a Routine Part of Developing Conceptual Assessments.. CBE life sciences education. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-10-0307
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T21:46:14.619Z