Evaluating the reliability and validity of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 among people with mental health conditions in seven low- and middle-income countries: analysis of secondary data.
- DOI
- 10.1192/bjo.2025.10778
- Published
- 2025-10-01
- Container
- BJPsych Open
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1192/bjo.2025.10778,
title = {Evaluating the reliability and validity of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 among people with mental health conditions in seven low- and middle-income countries: analysis of secondary data.},
author = {Mihretu A and Aleyan S and Schmider J and Hanlon C and Lund C and Araya R and White A and Habtamu K.},
year = {2025},
journal = {BJPsych Open},
doi = {10.1192/bjo.2025.10778},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10778}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Evaluating the reliability and validity of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 among people with mental health conditions in seven low- and middle-income countries: analysis of secondary data. AU - Mihretu A AU - Aleyan S AU - Schmider J AU - Hanlon C AU - Lund C AU - Araya R AU - White A AU - Habtamu K. PY - 2025 JO - BJPsych Open DO - 10.1192/bjo.2025.10778 UR - https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10778 ER -
APA
A, M., S, A., J, S., C, H., C, L., R, A., A, W., & K., H. (2025). Evaluating the reliability and validity of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 among people with mental health conditions in seven low- and middle-income countries: analysis of secondary data.. BJPsych Open. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10778
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-27T02:40:33.102Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-27T02:40:33.101Z