Variations between, and within, jurisdictions in the use of community treatment orders and other compulsory community treatment: study of 402 060 people across four Australian states.
- DOI
- 10.1192/bjo.2025.23
- Published
- 2025 Mar 21
- Container
- BJPsych open
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1192/bjo.2025.23,
title = {Variations between, and within, jurisdictions in the use of community treatment orders and other compulsory community treatment: study of 402 060 people across four Australian states.},
author = {Kisely S and Bull C and Zirnsak T and Edan V and Gould M and Lawn S and Light E and Maylea C and Newton-Howes G and Ryan CJ and Weller P and Brophy L},
year = {2025},
journal = {BJPsych open},
doi = {10.1192/bjo.2025.23},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.23}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Variations between, and within, jurisdictions in the use of community treatment orders and other compulsory community treatment: study of 402 060 people across four Australian states. AU - Kisely S AU - Bull C AU - Zirnsak T AU - Edan V AU - Gould M AU - Lawn S AU - Light E AU - Maylea C AU - Newton-Howes G AU - Ryan CJ AU - Weller P AU - Brophy L PY - 2025 JO - BJPsych open DO - 10.1192/bjo.2025.23 UR - https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.23 ER -
APA
S, K., C, B., T, Z., V, E., M, G., S, L., E, L., C, M., G, N., CJ, R., P, W., & L, B. (2025). Variations between, and within, jurisdictions in the use of community treatment orders and other compulsory community treatment: study of 402 060 people across four Australian states.. BJPsych open. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.23
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T22:29:39.082Z