Direct Versus Videolaryngoscopy for Emergency Tracheal Intubation of Trauma Patients in Hospital: A Systematic Review.

Atassi G, Louro J, Hneiny L, Dudaryk R

Open source

DOI
10.1213/ane.0000000000007804
Published
2026 Aug 1
Container
Anesthesia and analgesia
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1213/ane.0000000000007804,
  title = {Direct Versus Videolaryngoscopy for Emergency Tracheal Intubation of Trauma Patients in Hospital: A Systematic Review.},
  author = {Atassi G and Louro J and Hneiny L and Dudaryk R},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Anesthesia and analgesia},
  doi = {10.1213/ane.0000000000007804},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007804}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Direct Versus Videolaryngoscopy for Emergency Tracheal Intubation of Trauma Patients in Hospital: A Systematic Review.
AU  - Atassi G
AU  - Louro J
AU  - Hneiny L
AU  - Dudaryk R
PY  - 2026
JO  - Anesthesia and analgesia
DO  - 10.1213/ane.0000000000007804
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007804
ER  - 

APA

G, A., J, L., L, H., & R, D. (2026). Direct Versus Videolaryngoscopy for Emergency Tracheal Intubation of Trauma Patients in Hospital: A Systematic Review.. Anesthesia and analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000007804

Source records