Accuracy in Step Counting Is Not Accuracy in Quantifying Walking Activity: A Criterion Validity Study of Wearable Devices Under Free-Living Conditions.

Chanteau A, Faity G, Mahe G, Le Faucheur A

Open source

DOI
10.1249/mss.0000000000004111
Published
2026 Aug 18
Container
Medicine and science in sports and exercise
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1249/mss.0000000000004111,
  title = {Accuracy in Step Counting Is Not Accuracy in Quantifying Walking Activity: A Criterion Validity Study of Wearable Devices Under Free-Living Conditions.},
  author = {Chanteau A and Faity G and Mahe G and Le Faucheur A},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Medicine and science in sports and exercise},
  doi = {10.1249/mss.0000000000004111},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000004111}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Accuracy in Step Counting Is Not Accuracy in Quantifying Walking Activity: A Criterion Validity Study of Wearable Devices Under Free-Living Conditions.
AU  - Chanteau A
AU  - Faity G
AU  - Mahe G
AU  - Le Faucheur A
PY  - 2026
JO  - Medicine and science in sports and exercise
DO  - 10.1249/mss.0000000000004111
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000004111
ER  - 

APA

A, C., G, F., G, M., & A, L. F. (2026). Accuracy in Step Counting Is Not Accuracy in Quantifying Walking Activity: A Criterion Validity Study of Wearable Devices Under Free-Living Conditions.. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000004111

Source records