Critical Thinking in English Language Teaching: A Bibliometric Analysis .
- DOI
- 10.12688/f1000research.171160.1
- Published
- 2025
- Container
- F1000Research
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.12688/f1000research.171160.1,
title = {Critical Thinking in English Language Teaching: A Bibliometric Analysis .},
author = {Sukmojati E and Al Viana S and Kale Djami M and Fauzi A and Syafirah D and O D Bana E},
year = {2025},
journal = {F1000Research},
doi = {10.12688/f1000research.171160.1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.171160.1}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Critical Thinking in English Language Teaching: A Bibliometric Analysis . AU - Sukmojati E AU - Al Viana S AU - Kale Djami M AU - Fauzi A AU - Syafirah D AU - O D Bana E PY - 2025 JO - F1000Research DO - 10.12688/f1000research.171160.1 UR - https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.171160.1 ER -
APA
E, S., S, A. V., M, K. D., A, F., D, S., & E, O. D. B. (2025). Critical Thinking in English Language Teaching: A Bibliometric Analysis .. F1000Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.171160.1
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T06:25:44.072Z