Letters: Response to ‘Food for thought: innovation and debate’ <i>Journal of Wound Care</i> July 2017; 26: 7.
- DOI
- 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.9.570
- Published
- 2017-09-02
- Container
- Journal of Wound Care
- Publisher
- Mark Allen Group
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.12968/jowc.2017.26.9.570,
title = {Letters: Response to ‘Food for thought: innovation and debate’ <i>Journal of Wound Care</i> July 2017; 26: 7.},
author = {T. Swanson and R. Cooper and D.H. Keast},
year = {2017},
journal = {Journal of Wound Care},
doi = {10.12968/jowc.2017.26.9.570},
url = {https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2017.26.9.570}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Letters: Response to ‘Food for thought: innovation and debate’ <i>Journal of Wound Care</i> July 2017; 26: 7. AU - T. Swanson AU - R. Cooper AU - D.H. Keast PY - 2017 JO - Journal of Wound Care DO - 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.9.570 UR - https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2017.26.9.570 ER -
APA
Swanson, T., Cooper, R., & Keast, D. (2017). Letters: Response to ‘Food for thought: innovation and debate’ <i>Journal of Wound Care</i> July 2017; 26: 7.. Journal of Wound Care. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2017.26.9.570
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T16:23:49.384Z