Comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of different detection methods in ultrasound optical tomography

Alexander Bengtsson, David Hill, Kevin Shortiss, Lars Rippe, Stefan Kröll

Open source

DOI: 10.1364/boe.457075
Published: 2022-08-18
Container: Biomedical Optics Express
Publisher: Optica Publishing Group
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1364/boe.457075,
  title = {Comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of different detection methods in ultrasound optical tomography},
  author = {Alexander Bengtsson and David Hill and Kevin Shortiss and Lars Rippe and Stefan Kröll},
  year = {2022},
  journal = {Biomedical Optics Express},
  doi = {10.1364/boe.457075},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.457075}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of different detection methods in ultrasound optical tomography
AU  - Alexander Bengtsson
AU  - David Hill
AU  - Kevin Shortiss
AU  - Lars Rippe
AU  - Stefan Kröll
PY  - 2022
JO  - Biomedical Optics Express
DO  - 10.1364/boe.457075
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.457075
ER  -

APA

Bengtsson, A., Hill, D., Shortiss, K., Rippe, L., & Kröll, S. (2022). Comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of different detection methods in ultrasound optical tomography. Biomedical Optics Express. https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.457075

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T15:34:51.139Z