How Many Rings for Binary Phase Masks Co-optimized for Depth of Field Extension?

Rafael Falcón, Caroline Kulcsár, François Goudail

DOI: 10.1364/cosi.2016.cth1d.5
Published: 2016
Container: Not recorded
Publisher: OSA
Open access: no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 49/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1364/cosi.2016.cth1d.5,
  title = {How Many Rings for Binary Phase Masks Co-optimized for Depth of Field Extension?},
  author = {Rafael Falcón and Caroline Kulcsár and François Goudail},
  year = {2016},
  doi = {10.1364/cosi.2016.cth1d.5},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1364/cosi.2016.cth1d.5}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - How Many Rings for Binary Phase Masks Co-optimized for Depth of Field Extension?
AU  - Rafael Falcón
AU  - Caroline Kulcsár
AU  - François Goudail
PY  - 2016
DO  - 10.1364/cosi.2016.cth1d.5
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1364/cosi.2016.cth1d.5
ER  -

APA

Falcón, R., Kulcsár, C., & Goudail, F. (2016). How Many Rings for Binary Phase Masks Co-optimized for Depth of Field Extension?. https://doi.org/10.1364/cosi.2016.cth1d.5

Source records

hal · retrieved 2026-09-25T17:06:35.117Z