On the validity of two-flux and four-flux models for light scattering in translucent layers: angular distribution of internally reflected light at the interfaces: erratum.
- DOI
- 10.1364/oe.587542
- Published
- 2026 Jan 26
- Container
- Optics express
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1364/oe.587542,
title = {On the validity of two-flux and four-flux models for light scattering in translucent layers: angular distribution of internally reflected light at the interfaces: erratum.},
author = {Gautheron A and Clerc R and Duveiller V and Simonot L and Montcel B and Hébert M},
year = {2026},
journal = {Optics express},
doi = {10.1364/oe.587542},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.587542}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - On the validity of two-flux and four-flux models for light scattering in translucent layers: angular distribution of internally reflected light at the interfaces: erratum. AU - Gautheron A AU - Clerc R AU - Duveiller V AU - Simonot L AU - Montcel B AU - Hébert M PY - 2026 JO - Optics express DO - 10.1364/oe.587542 UR - https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.587542 ER -
APA
A, G., R, C., V, D., L, S., B, M., & M, H. (2026). On the validity of two-flux and four-flux models for light scattering in translucent layers: angular distribution of internally reflected light at the interfaces: erratum.. Optics express. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.587542
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T13:36:56.154Z