Response to: “Questioning the evidence for BCI-based communication in the complete locked-in state”

Ujwal Chaudhary, Sudhir Pathak, Niels Birbaumer

Open source

DOI
10.1371/journal.pbio.3000063
Published
2019-04-08
Container
PLOS Biology
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

serious concern Score 11/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000063,
  title = {Response to: “Questioning the evidence for BCI-based communication in the complete locked-in state”},
  author = {Ujwal Chaudhary and Sudhir Pathak and Niels Birbaumer},
  year = {2019},
  journal = {PLOS Biology},
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pbio.3000063},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000063}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Response to: “Questioning the evidence for BCI-based communication in the complete locked-in state”
AU  - Ujwal Chaudhary
AU  - Sudhir Pathak
AU  - Niels Birbaumer
PY  - 2019
JO  - PLOS Biology
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000063
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000063
ER  - 

APA

Chaudhary, U., Pathak, S., & Birbaumer, N. (2019). Response to: “Questioning the evidence for BCI-based communication in the complete locked-in state”. PLOS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000063

Source records