Leveraging prompt-driven generative AI for systematic reviews in digital psychiatry: A stage-matched comparative proof-of-concept for healthcare researchers and clinicians.
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001666
- Published
- 2026 Sep
- Container
- PLOS digital health
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001666,
title = {Leveraging prompt-driven generative AI for systematic reviews in digital psychiatry: A stage-matched comparative proof-of-concept for healthcare researchers and clinicians.},
author = {Parkington K and Joseph JT and Musleh K and Rouleau-Tang M and Persaud A and Rueda A and Teferra BG and Al-Shamali HF and Mao W and Nezhad FG and Burback L and Zhang Y and Jetly R and Vermetten E and Monson C and Krishnan S and Zeifman RJ and Greenshaw A and Lou W and Bhat V},
year = {2026},
journal = {PLOS digital health},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pdig.0001666},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001666}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Leveraging prompt-driven generative AI for systematic reviews in digital psychiatry: A stage-matched comparative proof-of-concept for healthcare researchers and clinicians. AU - Parkington K AU - Joseph JT AU - Musleh K AU - Rouleau-Tang M AU - Persaud A AU - Rueda A AU - Teferra BG AU - Al-Shamali HF AU - Mao W AU - Nezhad FG AU - Burback L AU - Zhang Y AU - Jetly R AU - Vermetten E AU - Monson C AU - Krishnan S AU - Zeifman RJ AU - Greenshaw A AU - Lou W AU - Bhat V PY - 2026 JO - PLOS digital health DO - 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001666 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001666 ER -
APA
K, P., JT, J., K, M., M, R., A, P., A, R., BG, T., HF, A., W, M., FG, N., L, B., Y, Z., R, J., E, V., C, M., S, K., RJ, Z., A, G., W, L., & V, B. (2026). Leveraging prompt-driven generative AI for systematic reviews in digital psychiatry: A stage-matched comparative proof-of-concept for healthcare researchers and clinicians.. PLOS digital health. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001666