Assessing the availability and scope of routine data on post-pregnancy family planning: A cross-sectional review of registers and reporting tools in 18 low- and middle-income countries.
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005205
- Published
- 2025
- Container
- PLOS global public health
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pgph.0005205,
title = {Assessing the availability and scope of routine data on post-pregnancy family planning: A cross-sectional review of registers and reporting tools in 18 low- and middle-income countries.},
author = {Sitrin D and Brunie A and Rosenberg R and Wilson L and Lebetkin E and Kagimu R and Makumbi F},
year = {2025},
journal = {PLOS global public health},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pgph.0005205},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005205}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Assessing the availability and scope of routine data on post-pregnancy family planning: A cross-sectional review of registers and reporting tools in 18 low- and middle-income countries. AU - Sitrin D AU - Brunie A AU - Rosenberg R AU - Wilson L AU - Lebetkin E AU - Kagimu R AU - Makumbi F PY - 2025 JO - PLOS global public health DO - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005205 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005205 ER -
APA
D, S., A, B., R, R., L, W., E, L., R, K., & F, M. (2025). Assessing the availability and scope of routine data on post-pregnancy family planning: A cross-sectional review of registers and reporting tools in 18 low- and middle-income countries.. PLOS global public health. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005205
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T06:41:02.572Z