Challenging the assumption that experience- and training-related factors improve accuracy of cervical cancer screening image interpretation: Evidence from Tanzania.
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgph.0007074
- Published
- 2026
- Container
- PLOS global public health
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pgph.0007074,
title = {Challenging the assumption that experience- and training-related factors improve accuracy of cervical cancer screening image interpretation: Evidence from Tanzania.},
author = {Inturrisi F and Yuma S and Mchome B and Mremi A and Marandu PD and West N and Chelva M and Datta RR and Simpson A and Ajenifuja KO and Adepiti CA and Desai KT and Wentzensen N and Boyd-Morin J and Egemen D and Jeronimo JA and de Sanjosé S and Schiffman M and Yeates K},
year = {2026},
journal = {PLOS global public health},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pgph.0007074},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007074}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Challenging the assumption that experience- and training-related factors improve accuracy of cervical cancer screening image interpretation: Evidence from Tanzania. AU - Inturrisi F AU - Yuma S AU - Mchome B AU - Mremi A AU - Marandu PD AU - West N AU - Chelva M AU - Datta RR AU - Simpson A AU - Ajenifuja KO AU - Adepiti CA AU - Desai KT AU - Wentzensen N AU - Boyd-Morin J AU - Egemen D AU - Jeronimo JA AU - de Sanjosé S AU - Schiffman M AU - Yeates K PY - 2026 JO - PLOS global public health DO - 10.1371/journal.pgph.0007074 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007074 ER -
APA
F, I., S, Y., B, M., A, M., PD, M., N, W., M, C., RR, D., A, S., KO, A., CA, A., KT, D., N, W., J, B., D, E., JA, J., S, D. S., M, S., & K, Y. (2026). Challenging the assumption that experience- and training-related factors improve accuracy of cervical cancer screening image interpretation: Evidence from Tanzania.. PLOS global public health. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007074
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T13:37:04.835Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T13:37:04.837Z