Cost-effectiveness of esketamine versus alternative treatment strategies for treatment-resistant depression in Hong Kong: A multi-armed modeling study.

Li Y, Chan VKY, Jit M, Cheng FWT, Yiu HHE, Bishai DM, Craig D, Chan EWY, Chan SSM, Li X

Open source

DOI
10.1371/journal.pmed.1005047
Published
2026 Apr
Container
PLoS medicine
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pmed.1005047,
  title = {Cost-effectiveness of esketamine versus alternative treatment strategies for treatment-resistant depression in Hong Kong: A multi-armed modeling study.},
  author = {Li Y and Chan VKY and Jit M and Cheng FWT and Yiu HHE and Bishai DM and Craig D and Chan EWY and Chan SSM and Li X},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {PLoS medicine},
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pmed.1005047},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1005047}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cost-effectiveness of esketamine versus alternative treatment strategies for treatment-resistant depression in Hong Kong: A multi-armed modeling study.
AU  - Li Y
AU  - Chan VKY
AU  - Jit M
AU  - Cheng FWT
AU  - Yiu HHE
AU  - Bishai DM
AU  - Craig D
AU  - Chan EWY
AU  - Chan SSM
AU  - Li X
PY  - 2026
JO  - PLoS medicine
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1005047
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1005047
ER  - 

APA

Y, L., VKY, C., M, J., FWT, C., HHE, Y., DM, B., D, C., EWY, C., SSM, C., & X, L. (2026). Cost-effectiveness of esketamine versus alternative treatment strategies for treatment-resistant depression in Hong Kong: A multi-armed modeling study.. PLoS medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1005047

Source records