Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0010072
- Published
- 2010-04-08
- Container
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0010072,
title = {Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?},
author = {Richard L. Kravitz and Peter Franks and Mitchell D. Feldman and Martha Gerrity and Cindy Byrne and William M. Tierney},
year = {2010},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0010072},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010072}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care? AU - Richard L. Kravitz AU - Peter Franks AU - Mitchell D. Feldman AU - Martha Gerrity AU - Cindy Byrne AU - William M. Tierney PY - 2010 JO - PLoS ONE DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0010072 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010072 ER -
APA
Kravitz, R. L., Franks, P., Feldman, M. D., Gerrity, M., Byrne, C., & Tierney, W. M. (2010). Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010072
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T09:55:21.395Z