How does reviewing the evidence change veterinary surgeons' beliefs regarding the treatment of ovine footrot? A quantitative and qualitative study.

Higgins HM, Green LE, Green MJ, Kaler J.

Open source

DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0064175
Published
2013-05-16
Container
PLoS One
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0064175,
  title = {How does reviewing the evidence change veterinary surgeons' beliefs regarding the treatment of ovine footrot? A quantitative and qualitative study.},
  author = {Higgins HM and  Green LE and  Green MJ and  Kaler J.},
  year = {2013},
  journal = {PLoS One},
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0064175},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064175}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - How does reviewing the evidence change veterinary surgeons' beliefs regarding the treatment of ovine footrot? A quantitative and qualitative study.
AU  - Higgins HM
AU  -  Green LE
AU  -  Green MJ
AU  -  Kaler J.
PY  - 2013
JO  - PLoS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0064175
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064175
ER  - 

APA

HM, H., LE, G., MJ, G., & J., K. (2013). How does reviewing the evidence change veterinary surgeons' beliefs regarding the treatment of ovine footrot? A quantitative and qualitative study.. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064175

Source records